-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Minor bug fix and feature extension #33
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve modifications to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
@Gui-FernandesBR | @phmbressan could you please confirm if I need to evaluate static margin for each |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
lib/models/aerosurfaces.py (1)
Line range hint
1-53
: Implement multiple fins as per PR objectives.While the change to the
airfoil
attribute is an improvement, the PR objectives and linked issue #32 specifically request the implementation of multiple fins instead of a single set. This has not been addressed in the current changes.To fully meet the PR objectives, consider the following suggestions:
- Modify the
Fins
class to represent a single fin set.- Create a new class, e.g.,
RocketFins
, that contains a list ofFins
objects.- Update any relevant methods or functions that work with fins to handle multiple fin sets.
Here's a proposed structure:
class FinSet(BaseModel): fins_kind: FinsKinds name: str n: int root_chord: float tip_chord: Optional[float] span: float position: float cant_angle: float radius: float airfoil: List[Tuple[float, float]] class RocketFins(BaseModel): fin_sets: List[FinSet]This structure would allow for multiple sets of fins to be attached to a rocket, meeting the requirements outlined in the PR objectives and issue #32.
Would you like assistance in implementing this structure or creating a new issue to track this task?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- lib/models/aerosurfaces.py (2 hunks)
- lib/models/rocket.py (1 hunks)
- lib/services/rocket.py (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
lib/models/aerosurfaces.py (2)
2-2
: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.The addition of
List
andTuple
to the import statement fromtyping
is necessary to support the new type annotation for theairfoil
attribute in theFins
class.
37-37
: Airfoil representation improved, but multiple fins not addressed.The change from
airfoil: str
toairfoil: List[Tuple[float, float]]
allows for a more detailed representation of airfoil data, which is a positive improvement. This change enables the storage of multiple coordinate pairs to define the airfoil shape more precisely.However, this change does not directly address the PR objective of implementing multiple fins instead of a single set. The
Fins
class still represents a single set of fins, not multiple sets as mentioned in the linked issue #32.To verify if multiple fins are implemented elsewhere, let's search for any changes related to fins in other files:
lib/models/rocket.py (1)
63-80
: LGTM! The fins attribute change successfully implements multiple rocket fins.The modification from
Optional[Fins]
toOptional[List[Fins]]
aligns with the PR objective of allowing multiple sets of fins. This change enhances the flexibility of rocket design while maintaining backwards compatibility.Consider updating the default
airfoil
value to a more realistic shape. The current[(0.0, 0.0), (0.1, 0.1), (0.2, 0.2)]
appears to be a placeholder.Please ensure that all existing code using the
fins
attribute and theairfoil
parameter has been updated to accommodate these changes. Run the following script to identify potential areas that may need attention:Would you like assistance in updating the documentation to reflect these changes?
lib/services/rocket.py (1)
140-151
:⚠️ Potential issueEnsure Compatibility with Python Versions Below 3.10
The use of the
match
statement requires Python 3.10 or newer. If your project needs to support earlier Python versions, consider replacing thematch
statement with anif-elif-else
construct.Apply this diff to replace the
match
statement:- match kind: - case "TRAPEZOIDAL": + if kind == "TRAPEZOIDAL": rocketpy_finset = RocketPyTrapezoidalFins( n=fins.n, name=fins.name, root_chord=fins.root_chord, tip_chord=fins.tip_chord, span=fins.span, cant_angle=fins.cant_angle, rocket_radius=fins.radius, airfoil=fins.airfoil, ) - case "ELLIPTICAL": + elif kind == "ELLIPTICAL": rocketpy_finset = RocketPyEllipticalFins( n=fins.n, name=fins.name, root_chord=fins.root_chord, span=fins.span, cant_angle=fins.cant_angle, rocket_radius=fins.radius, airfoil=fins.airfoil, ) - case _: + else: raise ValueError(f"Invalid fins kind: {kind}")Likely invalid or redundant comment.
78505e2
to
3dcab07
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
lib/services/rocket.py (1)
66-71
: Approve changes with optimization suggestion.The implementation of multiple fin sets aligns well with the PR objectives. However, consider optimizing the static margin evaluation.
Consider moving the
evaluate_static_margin()
call outside the loop to improve performance:rocketpy_finset_list = cls.get_rocketpy_finset_list_from_fins_list( rocket.fins ) for finset in rocketpy_finset_list: rocketpy_rocket.aerodynamic_surfaces.add(finset, finset.position) - rocketpy_rocket.evaluate_static_margin() +rocketpy_rocket.evaluate_static_margin()This change would evaluate the static margin once after all fin sets have been added, potentially improving performance.
lib/models/rocket.py (1)
63-80
: Consider adding unit tests for multiple fins supportWith the introduction of support for multiple fins, it's important to ensure that this functionality works as expected. Consider adding unit tests to cover scenarios with multiple fins configurations.
Would you like assistance in creating unit tests for this new functionality?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- lib/models/aerosurfaces.py (2 hunks)
- lib/models/rocket.py (1 hunks)
- lib/services/rocket.py (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- lib/models/aerosurfaces.py
🔇 Additional comments (4)
lib/services/rocket.py (2)
1-1
: LGTM: Import changes are appropriate.The addition of
List
fromtyping
is necessary for the new method's type hinting. TheSelf
import, while not visible in the changes, may be used elsewhere in the file.
140-150
: LGTM: Well-implemented method for processing multiple fin sets.The new
get_rocketpy_finset_list_from_fins_list
method is well-implemented:
- It correctly converts
Fins
objects toRocketPyFins
objects.- Proper type hinting is used for input and output.
- The method handles the case of an empty fins list.
- The implementation is concise and clear.
This addition effectively supports the new multiple fins feature.
lib/models/rocket.py (2)
74-78
:⚠️ Potential issueVerify handling of updated
airfoil
parameterThe
airfoil
parameter in theFins
class has been changed from a string to aList[Tuple[float, float]]
. Ensure that all code interacting withFins.airfoil
accommodates the new data structure.Run the following script to find usages of
Fins.airfoil
:#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all occurrences where Fins.airfoil is accessed or modified. # Test: Search for code accessing Fins.airfoil. Expect: All usages handle List[Tuple[float, float]]. rg --type py 'Fins\..*airfoil' -A 5 -B 5
63-63
:⚠️ Potential issueEnsure compatibility with updated
fins
attribute typeThe
fins
attribute has been changed fromOptional[Fins]
toOptional[List[Fins]]
. Please verify that all references toRocket.fins
in the codebase are updated to handle a list ofFins
instances instead of a single instance.Run the following script to find usages of
Rocket.fins
:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
lib/models/aerosurfaces.py (2)
27-29
: LGTM: AngleUnit enum added correctly.The new
AngleUnit
enum is a good addition, providing a clear way to specify angle units for airfoil data.Consider adding a docstring to the
AngleUnit
class to explain its purpose and usage. For example:class AngleUnit(str, Enum): """ Enum representing the unit of angles used in airfoil data. """ RADIANS: str = "RADIANS" DEGREES: str = "DEGREES"
42-42
: LGTM: Fins class updated to support detailed airfoil data.The modification of the
airfoil
attribute in theFins
class is a significant improvement. It now supports a more structured representation of airfoil data, including coordinate pairs and the angle unit.Consider adding a comment or updating the class docstring to explain the new
airfoil
attribute structure. For example:class Fins(BaseModel): """ Represents the fins of a rocket. ... Attributes: ... airfoil (Tuple[List[Tuple[float, float]], AngleUnit]): A tuple containing a list of coordinate pairs defining the airfoil shape, and the unit (RADIANS or DEGREES) used for the angles. """ # ... other attributes ... airfoil: Tuple[List[Tuple[float, float]], AngleUnit]This will help users understand how to properly provide airfoil data.
lib/services/rocket.py (2)
66-71
: Implement multiple fin sets and optimize static margin evaluation.The changes successfully implement the ability to handle multiple fin sets, addressing the main objective of the PR. However, as mentioned in a previous comment, the static margin evaluation can be optimized.
Consider moving the
evaluate_static_margin()
call outside the loop to improve performance:rocketpy_finset_list = cls.get_rocketpy_finset_list_from_fins_list( rocket.fins ) for finset in rocketpy_finset_list: rocketpy_rocket.aerodynamic_surfaces.add(finset, finset.position) - rocketpy_rocket.evaluate_static_margin() +rocketpy_rocket.evaluate_static_margin()This change will evaluate the static margin once after all fin sets have been added, potentially improving performance.
140-150
: LGTM: New method for handling multiple fin sets.The new
get_rocketpy_finset_list_from_fins_list
method correctly implements the conversion fromFins
toRocketPyFins
objects, addressing the PR's objective. The empty list check is a good defensive programming practice, and the method uses appropriate type hinting.Consider using a list comprehension for a more concise implementation:
@classmethod def get_rocketpy_finset_list_from_fins_list( cls, fins_list: List[Fins] ) -> List[RocketPyFins]: return [cls.get_rocketpy_finset(fins, fins.fins_kind) for fins in fins_list] if fins_list else []This change maintains the same functionality while making the code more compact.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- lib/models/aerosurfaces.py (3 hunks)
- lib/models/rocket.py (1 hunks)
- lib/services/rocket.py (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
lib/models/aerosurfaces.py (2)
2-2
: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.The addition of
Tuple
andList
to the import statement from thetyping
module is appropriate and consistent with their usage in the updatedFins
class.
Line range hint
1-58
: Overall changes look good, but additional implementation needed for multiple fins.The modifications to the
Fins
class and the addition of theAngleUnit
enum improve the capability to define detailed airfoil data. This is a step in the right direction for enhancing rocket design features.However, the current changes don't directly address the primary objective of implementing multiple fins as mentioned in the linked issue #32. To fully meet the PR objectives, consider the following:
- Modify the rocket model (likely in a different file) to accept an array of
Fins
objects instead of a singleFins
object.- Update the POST rocket route to handle multiple fin sets.
- Implement logic to evaluate the static margin after adding all aerodynamic surfaces.
To verify the current implementation of fins in the rocket model, we can run the following script:
This will help us understand the current implementation and guide the necessary changes to support multiple fins.
lib/models/rocket.py (1)
63-76
: LGTM! Changes align with PR objectives, but consider additional steps.The modification of the
fins
attribute fromOptional[Fins]
toOptional[List[Fins]]
successfully implements the capability to attach multiple rocket fins, as outlined in the PR objectives. The default value provides backward compatibility, which is a good practice. Theairfoil
parameter change also addresses the bug fix mentioned in the PR summary.Consider adding a comment above the
fins
attribute to explain the new structure and its purpose. For example:# List of Fins objects allowing multiple fin sets for complex rocket designs fins: Optional[List[Fins]] = [...]Ensure that other parts of the codebase that may expect a single
Fins
instance are updated accordingly. Run the following script to identify potential areas that need attention:Would you like assistance in updating the documentation and unit tests to reflect these changes? This could include:
- Updating API documentation to explain the new multiple fins capability.
- Adding or modifying unit tests to cover scenarios with multiple fin sets.
- Updating any example code or tutorials that demonstrate rocket configuration.
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful! No conflicting usages of
Rocket.fins
found.The search for
Rocket.fins
references across all Python files did not reveal any unexpected or conflicting usages. This confirms that the modification fromOptional[Fins]
toOptional[List[Fins]]
is correctly implemented and does not adversely affect other parts of the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find usages of Rocket.fins that might need updating # Search for Rocket.fins usage echo "Searching for Rocket.fins usage:" rg --type python -A 5 'Rocket\.fins' # Search for assignments to Rocket.fins echo "Searching for assignments to Rocket.fins:" rg --type python -A 5 'rocket\.fins\s*='Length of output: 311
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find usages of Rocket.fins that might need updating # Search for Rocket.fins usage in .py files echo "Searching for Rocket.fins usage in .py files:" rg -A 5 'Rocket\.fins' -g '*.py' # Search for assignments to Rocket.fins in Python files echo "Searching for assignments to Rocket.fins in .py files:" rg -A 5 'rocket\.fins\s*=' -g '*.py'Length of output: 293
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Comprehensive search for Rocket.fins usages in Python files # Find all Python files and search for 'fins' references echo "Searching for 'fins' references in all Python files:" fd --extension py . | xargs grep -n -i 'fins' # Additionally, search for 'fin' in case of singular references echo "Searching for 'fin' references in all Python files:" fd --extension py . | xargs grep -n -i 'fin'Length of output: 10911
lib/services/rocket.py (1)
1-1
: LGTM: Import changes are appropriate.The addition of
List
fromtyping
is necessary for the new method's type hinting. TheSelf
import, while not visible in the changes, may be used elsewhere in the file.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking good.
- Fixed airfoil signature to be the same as power_off_drag (str -> List[tuples]) - Implement multiple rocket fins attachment Fixes #32 addresses pylint issue adjusts airfoil signature accordingly addresses review comments Update lib/services/rocket.py Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
3d5bac4
to
dc0138f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- lib/models/aerosurfaces.py (3 hunks)
- lib/models/rocket.py (1 hunks)
- lib/services/rocket.py (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- lib/models/aerosurfaces.py
- lib/services/rocket.py
Fixes #32
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation